On the other hand, the rights of the people under the law, when they are duly brought to issue before the court, must be forthrightly declared and enforced. On the one hand, seeking to superintend and rule upon intricate and technical programs like the ones in this case, an appointed judge is, or certainly should be, forcefully reminded that "courts are not the only agency of government that must be assumed to have capacity to govern." Stone, J., dissenting in United States v.
![aspira vs. ny board of education 1974 significance aspira vs. ny board of education 1974 significance](https://image3.slideserve.com/5693777/case-i-l.jpg)
1 The court's assignment in such cases calls for a nice mixture of humility and resolve. Chayes, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, 89 Harv.L.Rev.
Aspira vs. ny board of education 1974 significance trial#
The extensive steps required for compliance have placed this court in an increasingly common, but unvaryingly delicate and difficult, role for federal trial courts - the role of supervising faithful performance of tasks that are in their nature primarily administrative rather than judicial. ยง 2000d, federal regulations and guidelines thereunder, and the Supreme Court's enforcing pronouncements in Lau v. The decree was made pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
![aspira vs. ny board of education 1974 significance aspira vs. ny board of education 1974 significance](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/11/28/opinion/30australialetter36-28Vietnam-newsletter-slide-26BL-copy/28Vietnam-newsletter-slide-26BL-master675.jpg)
Plaintiffs, New York City public school students of Hispanic origin (along with their parents and guardians), are entitled to a program of bilingual education under a consent decree signed on August 29, 1974. Counsel of the City of New York, New York City, for defendants Michael S. Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., New York City, for plaintiffs Herbert Teitelbaum, Richard J.